THE THREE GARRIDEBS

Ralph Edwards - Fri, 8 Jul 1994

  1. Would a knighthood have hampered Holmes in his work?
  2. Does Watson suggest that the offer of a knighthood was attempted royal bribery?
  3. Did the chairs at 221B make bed preferable, or was it a new mattress?
  4. Does Garrideb as a name suggest any nationality?
  5. Were directories, other than telephone, available?
  6. Why are initials rather than first names common in British (and Canadian) phone books?
  7. Did Holmes deduce any personality from the responsive eyes?
  8. Would a recently arrived person normally encounter pictures of Holmes?
  9. What other business could have kept John Garrideb from finding Nathan promptly?
  10. Was being clean-shaven reflective of circumstances or only of national style?
  11. Should Watson have thought a 44 year-old to be quite a young man?
  12. When does twilight occur in London in the latter part of June?
  13. Why did Nathan tell John of the 6 p.m. visit when asked not to?
  14. Why would cataloging take so long with items so well labelled and classified?
  15. Why didn't Holmes expect Nathan to tell John of his plans?
  16. Were house-agents apt to have evening hours?
  17. Did Evans find building political influence impossible in England?
  18. Should Watson have fired his revolver?
  19. Why weren't the owner, house-agents or Mrs. Saunders curious about a sealed-off basement room?
  20. Did Evans find entering through the basement impractical during his six or more months of freedom?
  21. If he was so well supplied with funds, why did Prescott take a card game so seriously?
  22. If they were so perfect, how did the Yard learn about the counterfeit notes?
  23. What is a bolt-hole?
  24. Why did Holmes have Watson make his telephone calls?

Chris Redmond - Sat, 21 Oct 1995

This tale has been recognized as sharing the plot of The Red-Headed League and The Stock-Broker's Clerk. If indeed the plot is strong enough to be employed three times, which story makes the best use of it, and why?


Sonia Fetherston - Fri, 20 Mar 1998

It could be a comedy, or it could be a tragedy, or it could simply be the next story we peruse: The Adventure of the Three Garridebs. My weekly questions and comments as we begin the weekend:......


Steve Clarkson - Fri, 21 May 1999

It was a whimsical thing that brought Holmes out of his bed, where he had stayed for the past several days. Not much of a challenge, on the surface -- "Find a male adult named 'Garrideb'". Actually, three adult males with this improbable surname were required, but two were already at hand. All that stood between these two and a one-third share of fifteen million dollars was the lack of a third namesake, or so attorney John Garrideb's story ran.
In a few minutes the Mâitre de Chasse will sound the great hunting-horn and follow the Hounds in pursuit of a wily fox. This fox is not an ordinary one -- he is a known killer. The trail will lead from Topeka, Kansas to the London home of an eccentric collector of all kinds of artifacts and at the end even the redoubtable Watson will fall, wounded by the quarry.

"Why," said Nathan Garrideb, "I shall be the Hans Sloane of my age!" I fear that not everyone knows about Sir Hans Sloane (1660-1753), "The Great Collector" whose botanical and entymological specimens are housed in Britain's Natural History Museum to this day. Sir Hans's tastes and acquisitions were as far-ranging as his intellectual curiosity could take him, and in his time he contributed mightily to mankind's knowledge of the natural sciences. There is another Sherlockian connection to Sir Hans: "The Hans Sloane of My Age" was the Irregular Investiture of the late, beloved John Bennett Shaw.
This week's story is a brief one as the adventures go, and it is a story in which there are no winners save perhaps the much-maligned C.I.D. of the London police force. Consider: Holmes got no fee; Watson was wounded (albeit superficially); "John Garrideb" a.k.a. Killer Evans went back to prison; and poor old Nathan Garrideb was consigned to a nursing home. With respect to the latter, a person with such catholic tastes and inquisitive mind surely deserved a more kindly fate.
In the second paragraph of the story, Watson casually informs us that Holmes had refused a knighthood for unspecified (but we can guess) services, ostensibly to the Crown. While we understand that Holmes is an intensely private person, such a declination would have been a rebuff to the Sovereign, who at this time was Edward VII. Would Holmes have refused the Honours List had the ruler been Victoria, the gracious lady whose initials adorned the wall at 221B?
Our introduction to "Mr. John Garrideb, Counsellor at Law" clearly gives the impression that this is an intelligent, imaginative person; someone to be reckoned with. Later on, Holmes referred to him as "clever". But how intelligent, how clever could he be to have fallen prey to what were obviously trap questions posed by Holmes? And couldn't he have devised a simpler scheme to inveigle Nathan Garrideb away from his "museum"? News of a well-preserved hominid fossil on Piltdown Commons, for example, or a fine example of a Syracusan coin on sale for a pittance in Land's End? The more complex a scheme, the more parts of it there are to come undone, and Killer Evans's plan unravelled within minutes of his meeting with Holmes.
Do we dare suppose that Holmes would have killed Evans had Watson been fatally wounded? Does this fit with what we know of the character of the Master Detective? Is it consistent with his action when he saw Watson reel after being shot by Evans -- crashing his revolver down on Evans's head instead of shooting him? Could he have done in cold blood what he did not do in hot blood?
Why did Watson say that "the counterfeiter stands in a class by himself as a public danger"? Granted that counterfeiting is a felony, in what way does it endanger the public? And what happened to the £200,000 in Prescott's counterfeit bills? I note that the Yard was happy to discover his printing apparatus, but there was no further mention of the notes Prescott had already printed. Could it be that Holmes and Watson helped themselves before alerting the authorities?


Rosemary Michaud - Thu, 20 Jul 2000

Brad Keefauver - Thu, 13 Sep 2001


Return to Introducing the 60 Stories