BLACK PETER

Ralph Edwards - Fri, 7 Apr 1995

  1. Does a person normally reach his physical peak at age 41?
  2. What prior cases should have paid off handsomely?
  3. Why was Holdernesse such an exception?
  4. From whom did the Cardinal take his name?
  5. Was Hopkins a humble client?
  6. What message was left for the rough-looking inquirers?
  7. What other adventures mention the refuges?
  8. Did Watson have breakfast at noon?
  9. Why would such a case be Hopkins' first big chance?
  10. Did the family identify the knife but not the pouch?
  11. What friends would use the tobacco? Was providing tobacco for friends a frequent courtesy?
  12. Wouldn't retirement at age 39 be suspicious?
  13. Where, with a family, would Carey have traveled for five years?
  14. Was the young Miss Carey attractive?
  15. Could a drunk outrun practiced and sober runners?
  16. What was the result of the summoning?
  17. What was the purpose of the outhouse?
  18. Did footprints have significance in this case?
  19. How were the harpoons acquired?
  20. Wouldn't Holmes have cabled South America?
  21. What were the widow's finances?
  22. Was "the North" in Wales or elsewhere?
  23. Why did Hopkins visit the outhouse the previous evening?
  24. What had the villagers to fear at the cabin?
  25. Why was the ambuscade as late as 11 p.m.?
  26. Did Hopkins give a "Miranda" warning?
  27. What is a Ribston pippin?
  28. Why would silence have been adverse at a trial?
  29. Who determined the eight pounds?
  30. What did Lancaster and Pattins do during the struggle?
  31. With splashing blood, why were there no footprints?
  32. Did Neligan's golfing cause his late arrival?
  33. Why did Neligan wait so long to return to the hut?
  34. Why did Cairns take a week to appear?
  35. Would the securities go to Neligan or a court?
  36. Were the yacht destination and the Norway trip related?

Chris Redmond - Fri, 28 Jun 1996

In the introductory paragraphs of this story, Watson makes much of "the year '95", and it provides much of what solid information there is about Holmes's activities during 1895. To Sherlockians, of course, it is always 1895, which gives the cases of that year special importance. What qualities does Black Peter have that justify its position in Holmes's annus mirabilis?


Sonia Fetherston - Fri, 19 Sep 1997

In honor of this week's story, The Adventure of Black Peter, I spent much of Thursday buffeted by waves. Whew! Trade you my Dramamine for a towel? But it's not much safer here on dry land. Securities are missing. Harpoons are flying. And there's blood on the ledger book. Questions and comments:


Steve Clarkson - Fri, 4 Dec 1998

There had been a murder at Woodman's Lee. Peter Carey, a retired sea captain, was found in the cabin that served as his home, transfixed by a harpoon that had been driven through his chest with such force that he was pinned to the cabin wall "like a beetle on a card." Inspector Stanley Hopkins, a young Scotland Yard detective for whom Sherlock Holmes had high hopes, was called upon to investigate the case.
Clues were few...there were no visible footprints or other traces of the murderer. True, a notebook with the initials "J.H.N." on the cover was found on the floor near the door and a sealskin tobacco-pouch with the initials "P.C." inside it was on the table, which was unremarkable except for the fact that Peter Carey, or "Black Peter" as he was known for his beard and his humours, didn't smoke. A witness who had spent the preceding two hours in a local pub said that he saw the silhouette of a man on a blind in the window of the cabin, but stated that it wasn't that of Captain Carey.
Stanley Hopkins enlisted the assistance of Sherlock Holmes in the case, and Hopkins, Holmes, and Watson contrived to capture a nocturnal visitor who came to the cabin in search of something. The prisoner's name was John Hopley Neligan, son of an absconding West Country banker and embezzler of the same name. But Neligan was a slim, almost frail youth who didn't seem to match the evidence to hand other than the notebook with his initials on it.
In a few minutes the Mâitre de Chasse will summon the Hounds to give chase from Cornwall to Norway and back again on the scent of stolen securities which someone had been selling. At the end of the chase they will uncover a tale of murder and blackmail which led to the violent death of Captain Peter Carey, and they will also find the formidable man who killed him.

Stanley Hopkins describes the late Peter Carey as being pinned to the wall by a harpoon driven through his chest, with "his great brindled beard stuck upward in his agony." Now, I've always been under the impression that in most situations gravity does its work after death, and unless Carey had been standing on his head when so pinioned, how could his beard be sticking upward when it should have been draped down his chest, upon which his chin would repose in death?
There are a number of floor plans which could match the description of the interior of Black Peter's "cabin," and one question which arises is which wall he was pinned to. In any case, we'll assume that the door to the cabin was not less than ten feet from that wall, since if he had been skewered to the wall which contained the door it would have been difficult for the timorous servants to peep in and see his body. Yet we learn that Neligan Jr.'s notebook was found "near the door" and that one side of it was discolored by blood. How did Carey's blood manage to travel all the way to the door?
A few simple questions: Why did Neligan Sr. decide to flee to Norway, in specific? Was there no extradition treaty between the two countries at the time? Who tore the pages from Black Peter's logbook, and why? What room did James Lancaster and Hugh Pattins "step into" at Holmes's request? Why didn't Hopkins give Patrick Cairns the customary warning about statements being used in evidence when Cairns started to tell his side of the story? Was Neligan Jr. entitled to the remainder of the securities, and if so, could he have recovered those which were sold since they were stolen property?
The method Holmes used to put the handcuffs on Cairns sounds awkward if not downright impossible. Cairns was bending over to sign a document when "Holmes leaned over his shoulder and passed both hands over his neck." Can anyone explain how this would be a safe and effective way to handcuff a dangerous man of gigantic strength?
Holmes says that if Carey's killer was a seaman, "...it could only be a seaman who had been with [Carey] on the Sea Unicorn." Wasn't that a leap of faith? Could it not have been someone Carey met in his travels before settling in Woodman's Lee, for example?
Lastly, form a mental picture: Carey is sitting at one side of a table. Cairns is sitting opposite him. Carey, "spitting and cursing," pulls a clasp knife but is unable to take it from its sheath before he is transfixed by a harpoon and pinned to the wall. The wall must have been at least a couple of feet behind him when the harpoon was thrown, yet the sheathed knife was found "at his feet." But in any case, is it humanly possible to throw a harpoon hard enough not only to transfix a human being but to drive him back against a wall with such force that the point of the harpoon is embedded in the wall deeply enough to support the weight of a dead man's body? Did Cairns sell Holmes and the police a bill of goods with his story? Was Carey backed up against the wall in retreat instead of lunging at Cairns when the harpoon was thrown?


Rosemary Michaud - Thu, 10 Feb 2000

Brad Keefauver - Thu, 5 Apr 2001


Return to Introducing the 60 Stories